CO129-326 - Foreign Office - 1904 — Page 785

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed
Series Prev Next

આ પર

1

783

QİLİ TURONS

artbroget

2.

As regards the Archipelago Shipping and Trading Company Limited we have considered the papers before us and are of opinion that its principal place of business is not its registered Office in England but it is situated in Smyrna.

3.

We are of opinion that the Board were right in instructing the Consul at Smyrna (notwithstanding the registration of the Company) to refuse a provisional Certificate of ownership under Section 22 of the Act of 1894 and that they ought to refuse the registration of the Company as the owners of British Ships.

(Signed)

#

體

R. B. Finlay.

Edward Carson.

Henry Sutton.

Royal Courts of Justice,

23rd July, 1901.

Edit History

2026-06-02 07:48:57 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
આ પર 1 783 QİLİ TURONS artbroget 2. As regards the Archipelago Shipping and Trading Company Limited we have considered the papers before us and are of opinion that its principal place of business is not its registered Office in England but it is situated in Smyrna. 3. We are of opinion that the Board were right in instructing the Consul at Smyrna (notwithstanding the registration of the Company) to refuse a provisional Certificate of ownership under Section 22 of the Act of 1894 and that they ought to refuse the registration of the Company as the owners of British Ships. (Signed) # 體 R. B. Finlay. Edward Carson. Henry Sutton. Royal Courts of Justice, 23rd July, 1901.
Baseline (Original)
આ પર 1 783 QİLİ TURONS artbroget 2. As regards the Archipelago Shipping and Trading Company Limited we have considered the papers before us and are of opinion that its principal place of business is not its registered Office in England but it is situated in Suyrna. 3. We are of opinion that the Board were right in instructing the Consul at Smyrna (notwithstanding the registration of the Company) to refuse a provision- al Certificate of ownership under Section 22 of the Act of 1894 and that they ought to refuse the regis- tration of the Company as the owners of British Ships. (Signed) # 體 R. B. Finlay. Edward Carson. Henry Sutton. Royal Courts of Justice, 23rd July, 1901.
2026-06-02 07:48:57 · Baseline
View content

આ પર

1

783

QİLİ TURONS

artbroget

2.

As regards the Archipelago Shipping and

Trading Company Limited we have considered the papers

before us and are of opinion that its principal place

of business is not its registered Office in England but

it is situated in Suyrna.

3.

We are of opinion that the Board were right

in instructing the Consul at Smyrna (notwithstanding

the registration of the Company) to refuse a provision-

al Certificate of ownership under Section 22 of the

Act of 1894 and that they ought to refuse the regis-

tration of the Company as the owners of British Ships.

(Signed)

#

體

R. B. Finlay.

Edward Carson.

Henry Sutton.

Royal Courts of Justice,

23rd July, 1901.

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.